MERS\u0130N MAR\u0130NA\u2019DA Y\u00d6NETMEL\u0130KLER H\u0130\u00c7E SAYILDI<\/p>\n
Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Mersin \u015eubesi 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda faaliyete ge\u00e7en Mersin Yat Liman\u0131’na y\u00f6nelik bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi. Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Mersin \u015eubesi Y\u00f6netim Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamada, “Mersin Yat Liman\u0131, t\u00fcm yasa ve y\u00f6netmelikler hi\u00e7e say\u0131larak, i\u00e7erisindeki s\u00fcs havuzunda kay\u0131klar\u0131n y\u00fczd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ulusal ve uluslararas\u0131 markalar\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde bar\u0131nd\u0131ran dev bir al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f merkezine d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.” dedi.\u00a0<\/p>\n
2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda faaliyete ge\u00e7en Mersin Yat Liman\u0131 hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klama yapan Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Mersin \u015eubesi Y\u00f6netim Kurulu ‘Yat liman\u0131 ama\u00e7l\u0131 1\/5000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli Naz\u0131m \u0130mar Plan\u0131 ve 1\/1000 \u00d6l\u00e7ekli Uygulama \u0130mar Plan\u0131 plan notu iptali\/ ilavesi’ \u00fczerine a\u00e7\u0131klama ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti. Kurul yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131nda Mersin Yat Liman\u0131’n\u0131n yat liman\u0131 kimli\u011fini kaybetmi\u015f, t\u00fcm yasa ve y\u00f6netmelikler hi\u00e7e say\u0131larak, i\u00e7erisindeki s\u00fcs havuzunda kay\u0131klar\u0131n y\u00fczd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ulusal ve uluslararas\u0131 markalar\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde bar\u0131nd\u0131ran dev bir al\u0131\u015fveri\u015f merkezine d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc belirtildi.
\nMimarlar Odas\u0131 Mersin \u015eubesi, “Dolgu alan\u0131 ve marina yapma y\u00f6netmeli\u011fine ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir \u015fekilde Marina AVM olarak binlerce metrekare in\u015faat alan\u0131 olu\u015fturulmu\u015f, yeni fonksiyon y\u00fcklemeleri, ek ticari ve e\u011flence birimleriyle \u00f6zellikle belirli kapasitede ta\u015f\u0131t trafi\u011fi i\u00e7in hesaplanan sahil yolunda i\u00e7inden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lmaz trafik y\u00fck\u00fcyle, Adnan Menderes Bulvar\u0131\u2019nda trafi\u011fi durma noktas\u0131na getirmi\u015ftir. \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 1 nolu Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Te\u015fkilat\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Cumhurba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kararnamesinin 102(j) maddesi ve 3621 say\u0131l\u0131 K\u0131y\u0131 Kanununun 7. Maddesi kapsam\u0131nda onaylanan ve Mersin Valili\u011fi \u00c7evre \u015eehircilik \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taraf\u0131ndan 05.06.2020 tarihinde ask\u0131ya \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lan \u201cMersin \u0130li, Yeni\u015fehir \u0130l\u00e7esi, E\u011fri\u00e7am Mahallesi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde \u201cYat Liman\u0131 Ama\u00e7l\u0131 1\/5000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli Naz\u0131m \u0130mar Plan\u0131 ve 1\/1000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli Uygulama \u0130mar Plan\u0131 Plan Notu \u0130ptali\/\u0130lavesi\u201dnin ask\u0131 s\u00fcresi tamamlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Mersin \u015eubesi olarak ilave plan notuyla ilgili itirazlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 yasal s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde Mersin Valili\u011fi \u00c7evre \u015eehircilik \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u2018ne iletmi\u015f bulunuyoruz.” ifadelerini kulland\u0131.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cPlan kademeleri aras\u0131nda s\u00fcreklilik ve b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fck sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u201d<\/p>\n
\u00a0Plan Notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin amac\u0131, plan a\u00e7\u0131klama raporunda \u201c T.C. \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 08.07.2013 tarih ve 10758 say\u0131 ile onaylanan Mersin ili, Yeni\u015fehir \u0130l\u00e7esi, 1\/1000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli Yat Liman\u0131 \u0130mar Plan\u0131 Plan Notu De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin, T.C. MERS\u0130N 2. \u0130DARE MAHKEMES\u0130 taraf\u0131ndan 13.01.2020 tarih 2018\/956 Esas No, 2020\/41 Karar No ile iptal edildi\u011fi belirtilirken haz\u0131rlanan plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ile, 1\/1000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli uygulama imar plan\u0131 ve 1\/5000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli naz\u0131m imar plan\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki uyumsuzlu\u011fun giderilerek, plan kademeleri aras\u0131nda s\u00fcreklilik ve b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fck sa\u011flanmas\u0131 ama\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r\u201d \u015feklinde tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu ancak dava konusu plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin iptal karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7eleri olan yap\u0131 yo\u011funlu\u011fu ve yap\u0131 y\u00fckseklik de\u011ferlerinin plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finde ayn\u0131 \u015fekilde i\u015flendi\u011fi taraf\u0131m\u0131zca tespit edilmi\u015ftir denildi.<\/p>\n
\u201cYat Liman\u0131 i\u015flevini yerine getiremiyor\u201d<\/p>\n
S\u00f6z konusu dava sonucu ve gerek\u00e7esini a\u00e7\u0131klayan Y\u00f6netim Kurulu;
\n\u201cDava konusu plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ile \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen yap\u0131 yo\u011funlu\u011fu ve yap\u0131 y\u00fcksekli\u011fi de\u011ferleri ile K\u0131y\u0131 Kanununun Uygulanmas\u0131na Dair Y\u00f6netmelik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinde belirtilen yap\u0131 yo\u011funlu\u011fu ve yap\u0131 y\u00fcksekli\u011fi de\u011ferleri aras\u0131nda uyumsuzluk bulundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olup, plan kademelenmesi ilkesi kapsam\u0131nda planlama ilkeleri ve \u015fehircilik esaslar\u0131 ile kamu yarar\u0131na uygun bir yakla\u015f\u0131m benimsenmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lan dava konusu plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin hukuka ve mevzuata uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ” gerek\u00e7esiyle 13\/01\/2020 tarih ve E:2018\/956, K:2020\/41 say\u0131l\u0131 karar ile hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fundan ve iptaline karar verildi\u011finden, hukuka ve mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine dayan\u0131larak d\u00fczenlenen dava konusu 05.10.2018\/10.10.2018 tarih ve 2018\/1 say\u0131l\u0131 yap\u0131 ruhsatlar\u0131nda hukuka ve mevzuata uygunluk bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u2019\u2019 Ask\u0131daki 1\/5000 ve 1\/1000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli planlar\u0131n ilave plan notlar\u0131nda ve plan a\u00e7\u0131klama raporunda Yat Liman\u0131n\u0131n kuzeyini kapsayan alana ait, T.C. \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan 30.11.2016 tarihinde Onaylanan Mersin \u0130li, Yeni\u015fehir \u0130l\u00e7esi Fuar, Piknik, E\u011flence, Park \u00c7ocuk Bah\u00e7esi ve Oyun Alan\u0131 ve A\u00e7\u0131k Spor Tesisi Alan\u0131 Ama\u00e7l\u0131 1\/1000 \u00d6l\u00e7ekli Revizyon Naz\u0131m \u0130mar Plan\u0131nda yat liman\u0131n bat\u0131s\u0131nda ikinci ta\u015f\u0131t giri\u015fi \u00f6nerilmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte yat liman\u0131na karadan girecek yatlar ile mevcut trafi\u011fin s\u0131k\u0131\u015fmas\u0131 \u00f6nlenmi\u015ftir.\u201d denildi.\u00a0<\/p>\n
“Ranta feda edilmesini istemiyor ve ikinci bir yolun a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 do\u011fru bulmuyoruz”<\/p>\n
Bu \u015fekilde belirtilen raporda Yat Liman\u0131 i\u015flevini yerine getiremeyen, yat liman\u0131na karadan girecek yatlar\u0131n trafi\u011fi s\u0131k\u0131\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esinin ger\u00e7e\u011fi yans\u0131tmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ortada oldu\u011funu vurgulayan Mimarlar Odas\u0131, \u201cYat Liman\u0131m\u0131z yat liman\u0131 olman\u0131n \u00f6tesinde ulusal ve uluslararas\u0131 markalar\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde bar\u0131nd\u0131ran uluslararas\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7ekte bir AVM\u2019ye d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fcn tek sebebi salt rant ve spek\u00fclatif ama\u00e7l\u0131 olan bu s\u00fcrecin eseridir. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7 sonunda yo\u011funluk art\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 ile birlikte olu\u015fan trafik ve eri\u015fim konusu i\u00e7inden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131lmaz bir hal alm\u0131\u015fken, ek ticari ve e\u011flence birimleriyle bu sorun daha da b\u00fcy\u00fcm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Kent park\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n b\u00f6l\u00fcnerek spek\u00fclatif ama\u00e7l\u0131 ranta feda edilmesini istemiyor ve ikinci bir yolun a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 do\u011fru bulmuyoruz.\u201d \u015feklinde a\u00e7\u0131klamada bulundular.<\/p>\n
“Marina\u2019daki toplam 14.200 metrekare \u00a0olmas\u0131 gerekirken in\u015faat alan\u0131 , 21 bin 718 metrekare”<\/p>\n
Daha \u00f6nceki s\u00fcre\u00e7te, Mersin kamuoyunu bilgilendirdiklerini ifade eden kurul in\u015fa edilmi\u015f olan ticari alanlara yeni alanlar eklenerek ticari alan\u0131n artt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, in\u015faat\u0131 devam eden ek binalarla birlikte Marina\u2019daki toplam in\u015faat alan\u0131n\u0131n 14.200 m2 olmas\u0131 gerekirken, mevcut yap\u0131la\u015fman\u0131n 21.718 m2 oldu\u011funu tespit ettiklerini s\u00f6yledi. \u00a0As\u0131l ve daha b\u00fcy\u00fck problemin, arsa alan\u0131n\u0131n 209.817 m2 olarak belirlenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ve projede y\u00fczde 10\u2019luk oranla 20.981 m2 in\u015faat izni verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyen Mimarlar Odas\u0131, \u201cBiz hesaplamalar\u0131m\u0131zda toplam arsa alan\u0131n\u0131n 209.817 m2 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, Marina\u2019n\u0131n toplam kara alan\u0131n\u0131n 142.000 m2 oldu\u011funu, mendirekler dahil edilse dahi toplam kara alan\u0131n\u0131n 185.000 m2 oldu\u011funu tespit etmi\u015f ve Mersin Marina\u2019da yap\u0131lan in\u015faat uygulamas\u0131 i\u00e7in baz al\u0131nan 209.817 metrekarelik arsa alan\u0131n neye g\u00f6re hesapland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sormu\u015ftuk. Bug\u00fcn gelinen a\u015famada \u00fcz\u00fclerek g\u00f6rmekteyiz ki 2 y\u0131l \u00f6nce yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z in\u015faat fazlas\u0131na dair tespitlerimiz, bakanl\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan da kabul edilmekte ve bu ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n yasal hale getirilmesi i\u00e7in bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma yap\u0131lma \u00e7abas\u0131 vard\u0131r. Kamu yarar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde objektif duru\u015f g\u00f6stermekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc odam\u0131z bu beyhude \u00e7aban\u0131n kamu yarar\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmekte ve bu uygulamaya kar\u015f\u0131 gerekli \u00e7abalar\u0131 sonuna kadar g\u00f6sterece\u011fimizi ve kamuoyunu bilgilendirmeye devam edece\u011fimizi beyan ederiz. \u0130n\u015faat fazlas\u0131na dair tespitlerimiz Mersin 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma karar\u0131 almas\u0131 ile de onaylanm\u0131\u015f oldu.\u201d \u015feklinde konu\u015ftular.<\/p>\n
“Hukuka ve mevzuata uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.”<\/p>\n
Mersin 2. \u0130dare Mahkemesi Y\u00fcr\u00fctmeyi durdurma karar\u0131 gerek\u00e7esi ve sonucu \u015fu \u015fekilde;
\n\u201cMersin Yat Liman\u0131nda yap\u0131lan tadilatlar ve ilave in\u015faatlar i\u00e7in verilen 17.11.2017 tarih ve 2017\/4 say\u0131l\u0131 yap\u0131 ruhsat\u0131n\u0131n ve ruhsat\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 olan \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 08.07.2013 tarih ve 10758 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flemi ile onaylanan Mersin \u0130li, Yeni\u015fehir \u0130l\u00e7esi, 1\/1000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli yat liman\u0131 imar plan\u0131 plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin; hukuka, \u015fehircilik ilkelerine, planlama esaslar\u0131na ve kamu yarar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu, de\u011fi\u015fiklik \u00f6ncesi onayl\u0131 yat liman\u0131na ait plan kararlar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcreklili\u011fi ile sosyal ve teknik alt yap\u0131 dengesini bozucu nitelikte oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclerek iptali istenmi\u015ftir. \u00a0S\u00f6z konusu plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7e ile hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011fundan, hukuka ve mevzuata ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fine dayan\u0131larak d\u00fczenlenen dava konusu 17.11.2017 tarih ve 2017\/4 say\u0131l\u0131 yap\u0131 ruhsat\u0131n\u0131n da hukuka ve mevzuata uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Bu karar ile normalden fazla yap\u0131la\u015fma ve y\u00f6netmeliklere uymayan fazla alanlar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve projenin kanun ve y\u00f6netmenliklere uygun hale getirilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu konuda yetki, ruhsat\u0131 resen veren \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019ndad\u0131r. Ruhsat\u0131 \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 verdi\u011fi i\u00e7in mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131 yerine getirmek de bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n g\u00f6revidir. \u0130nfaz karar\u0131n\u0131n bir an \u00f6nce yerine getirilmesi s\u00fcrecinin, \u00e7at\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcm\u00fcz olan TMMOB bile\u015feni meslek odalar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da takip edilece\u011finin bilinmesini isteriz. T\u00fcm bu noktalar dikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u201cMersin \u0130li, Yeni\u015fehir \u0130l\u00e7esi, E\u011fri\u00e7am Mahallesi s\u0131n\u0131rlar\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde \u201cYat Liman\u0131 Ama\u00e7l\u0131 1\/5000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli Naz\u0131m \u0130mar Plan\u0131 ve 1\/1000 \u00f6l\u00e7ekli Uygulama \u0130mar Plan\u0131 Plan Notu \u0130ptali\/\u0130lavesi\u201d ask\u0131daki haliyle hukuka ve mevzuata uygun olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kesinle\u015fmi\u015ftir.\u00a0<\/p>\n
A\u00e7\u0131klanan gerek\u00e7eler \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ilave plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin bu haliyle kabul edilebilir olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtir, plan notu de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin hukuka ve mevzuata uygun hale gelecek \u015fekilde yeniden haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131n\u0131 odam\u0131z, kentimiz ve kamu yarar\u0131 ad\u0131na talep ederiz.\u201d ifadeleri kullan\u0131ld\u0131<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
MERS\u0130N MAR\u0130NA\u2019DA Y\u00d6NETMEL\u0130KLER H\u0130\u00c7E SAYILDI Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Mersin \u015eubesi 2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda faaliyete ge\u00e7en Mersin Yat Liman\u0131’na y\u00f6nelik bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi. Mimarlar Odas\u0131 Mersin \u015eubesi Y\u00f6netim Kurulu taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131klamada, “Mersin … Devam\u0131n\u0131 Oku…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mersinekonomipolitikagazetesi.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7539"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mersinekonomipolitikagazetesi.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mersinekonomipolitikagazetesi.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mersinekonomipolitikagazetesi.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mersinekonomipolitikagazetesi.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7539"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mersinekonomipolitikagazetesi.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7539\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mersinekonomipolitikagazetesi.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mersinekonomipolitikagazetesi.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mersinekonomipolitikagazetesi.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}